In 2016, Donald Trump got about 46% of the vote. In 2020, he got around 47% (47.7% according to the last figures I saw, but it will go down as California gets around to counting its ballots). So hardly any change in overall support for Trump (although voters turnout was higher this time)--but has there been any change in who voted for him? There's been a lot of attention to his increased support among non-white voters: for example, Andrew Sullivan said "the GOP got the highest proportion of the minority vote since 1960!" But I haven't seen any systematic comparison of changes in support among different groups, so I'll give one here, based on the Edison exit polls:
Republican Vote, 2016-2020
2016
2020 Change
Men 52% 49% -3
Women 41% 43% +2
GAP 11 6
White 57% 57% 0
Black
8% 12% +4
Latino/a 28% 32% +4
Asian-Am. 27% 31% +4
GAP (B/W) 49 45
GAP (L/W)
29 25
White Men 62% 58% -4
White Women 52% 55% +3
Black Men 13% 18% +5%
Black Women 4% 8% +4%
Latino 32% 36% +4%
Latina 25% 28% +3%
Age 18-29 36% 35% -1%
30-44 52% 55% +3%
45-65 52% 49% -3%
65+ 52% 51% -1%
GAP(Y/O) 16 16
Urban 34% 37% +3%
Suburban 49% 48% -1%
Rural 61% 54% -7%
GAP (U/R) 27 17
2016
2020 Change
White Coll. 48% 49% +1%
White non-C 66% 64% -2%
Non-W coll 22% 27% +5%
Non-W non-coll 20% 26% +6%
GAP (White) 18 15
under $50,000 41% 42% +1%
$50K-49,999 49% 43% -6%
$100,000+
47% 54% +7%
GAP (LO/HI) 6 12
LGBT 14% 28% +14%
Not LGBT 47% 48% +1%
GAP 33 20
Veterans 60% 52% -8%
non-Vets 44% 46% +2%
GAP 16 6
W. Evangelical 80% 76% -4%
All others 34% 37% +3
GAP 46 39
I highlight the ones for which the gap changed by more than five percentage points.
On race and ethnicity, Trump did improve among both blacks and Latinos, but not by much--the black/white and Latino/white gaps are still very large. You could say that the increase among blacks--from 8% to 12%--is big in relative terms, but 12% isn't out of line with recent Republican performances--in 2004, George Bush got 11% of the black vote (and 44% of the Latino vote). So Sullivan's statement about it being the highest Republican support among racial minorities since 1960 is either misleading or simply wrong.
I can think of plausible explanations for two of the changes. In 2016, there were almost no differences by income--in 2020, there was a small but clear tendency for the Trump vote to increase with income. I would guess that this is because in 2016 there were some doubts about his economic policy, but as president he's followed a traditional Republican approach. The decline in support among evangelicals might be a reaction against his personal conduct--in 2016, you could believe that he would "grow into the office," but by 2020 it's clear that he is what he is. The other changes are puzzling--I can't think of a good reason why the urban/rural, LGBT/straight, or veteran/non-veteran gaps would decline. In fact, I would have guessed that the urban/rural and veteran/non-veteran gaps would increase, since his policies and rhetoric favored the military and disfavored cities. Of course, these figures affected by sampling error, and some of them are crudely measured, so they could be illusory. Still, there's clearly a lot for social scientists to think about.
No comments:
Post a Comment